JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 18, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Gennys Helena Rodriguez Vs. Accion Social Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Primero Civil Del Circuito De Cartagena Y La Sala Civil Familia Del Tribunal Superior De Cartagena. Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Sala Civil Familia Del Tribunal Superior De Cartagena
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Competencia de Juez Civil del Circuito
Principio Perpetuatio Jurisdictionis
  • No se puede trasladar conocimiento de tutela en razón del cambio de naturaleza de entidades demandadas por afectar derechos fundamentales
Acción De Tutela
  • Decreto 1382 de 2000 no establece competencia sino reglas de simple reparto
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior de Cartagena, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la accion de tutela de Gennys Helena Rodriguez contra Accion Social, el Departamento Administrativo de la Presidencia de la Republica, los Ministerios de Hacienda y Credito Publico, de la Proteccion Social, de Agricultura, y de Educacion, Corvivienda, Incoder, la Alcaldia Distrital de Cartagena de Indias y la Gobernacion de Bolivar.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.